eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, somebody had sex with a conservative.
Res, It's very poor form to refer to a commenter to your blog in your page posting, regardless of whether it's in poor taste. Pathetic, really. The motto at the Rising Hegemon page heading does seem to apply in this particular instance:
"....-- half-hearted or completely botched attempts at humor..."
Dear me! Did res color outside the lines by mentioning a commenter in a blog post??!! Call the police! Form a panel!! Oh noes!!! How will the Republic endure!
This tears it! O&A should vow never to visit this blog again! That will show her.
I didn't bother with reading the link since the posting doesn't really make any sense. And even though it's obvious that Res is saddled with a flawed worldview it still comes off as needlessly childish on her part.
On the other hand, your comment seems to indicate that you made considerable effort to read the entire thing.
Dan, I wasn't so much offended as I thought it lame and childish for Res to post in that particular manner. I won't be calling the internet police.
Res wasn't all that offensive, not like (for instance) Hedley's writing his wishes for me to contract an illness leading to death. Now, that was truly offensive.
How many U.S. soldiers has Olives, the Canadian troll, cheered on to their destruction? How many innocent Iraqis has Olives condemned to death as victims of his vanity wars?
OnA, your histrionics are nothing but 'pathetic' attempts to draw attention to your crippled ego.
OnA complains about this blog being childish? Really? Does it not READ this fucking blog?? Childish is an organizing principle around here. Poor taste de rigueur. Since such things obviously bother him (at least enough to comment on them), why does he not simply leave? Surely there are other people he can can call traitors and fifth-columnists who root for terrorists.
Rising Hegemon
You can call him "O&A", but to me he'll always be "my sexy little sociopath".
ReplyDeleteAh, well, by now, I'm pretty well convinced that all of O&A's sexual tales, misshapen as they may be, only involve one person....
ReplyDeleteRabelais could have made these little scenes hilarious. vox
ReplyDeleteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww, somebody had sex with a conservative.
ReplyDelete"sailboat, cat and rocketship"?
ReplyDeleteis that like a "Z"?
Res,
ReplyDeleteIt's very poor form to refer to a commenter to your blog in your page posting, regardless of whether it's in poor taste. Pathetic, really.
The motto at the Rising Hegemon page heading does seem to apply in this particular instance:
"....-- half-hearted or completely botched attempts at humor..."
"you are my sexy little socialist." (he is a republican and i am not)
ReplyDeleteHmmm. Not so sure. This was definitely hetero-sex; no wide stances, no mention of crystal meth, no farm animals.
Dear me! Did res color outside the lines by mentioning a commenter in a blog post??!! Call the police! Form a panel!! Oh noes!!! How will the Republic endure!
ReplyDeleteThis tears it! O&A should vow never to visit this blog again! That will show her.
Res, I see your post hit a chord with O&A. One wonders if it was '3. The Full Release' or '5. The Sweaty Political Fetishist'?
ReplyDeleteHedley,
ReplyDeleteI didn't bother with reading the link since the posting doesn't really make any sense. And even though it's obvious that Res is saddled with a flawed worldview it still comes off as needlessly childish on her part.
On the other hand, your comment seems to indicate that you made considerable effort to read the entire thing.
Yes. I did. Unlike you, OnA, I'm intellectually curious.
ReplyDelete'10. The Would-Be Artist' might work for ya, too.
Yes. I did. Unlike you, OnA, I'm intellectually curious.
ReplyDeleteIn your case, Hedley, it's probably helluva alot closer to sex-starved than it is "intellectually curious".
Maybe you should be callin' yerself Mr Handley Bones....
Then again, '8. The Unwanted Stump' might be the one best describing OnA.
ReplyDeleteDan,
ReplyDeleteI wasn't so much offended as I thought it lame and childish for Res to post in that particular manner. I won't be calling the internet police.
Res wasn't all that offensive, not like (for instance) Hedley's writing his wishes for me to contract an illness leading to death. Now, that was truly offensive.
.
ReplyDelete*yawn*
.
How many U.S. soldiers has Olives, the Canadian troll, cheered on to their destruction? How many innocent Iraqis has Olives condemned to death as victims of his vanity wars?
ReplyDeleteOnA, your histrionics are nothing but 'pathetic' attempts to draw attention to your crippled ego.
As posted earlier: give a rest, sister.
Sex-starved, OnA? Look no further than your favorite blogger.
ReplyDeleteOnA complains about this blog being childish? Really? Does it not READ this fucking blog?? Childish is an organizing principle around here. Poor taste de rigueur. Since such things obviously bother him (at least enough to comment on them), why does he not simply leave? Surely there are other people he can can call traitors and fifth-columnists who root for terrorists.
ReplyDeleteYou think the discourse at this blog is childish, DanF?
ReplyDeleteNo, you are! Called it, no backsies, infinity!