And in Kansas City there is this, which is among the most moving pictures I've seen this election cycle:
Jayden Brown, 9 listens to Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., at a rally held at the Liberty Memorial in Kansas City, Mo., Saturday, Oct. 18, 2008. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong)
I don't feel sorry for either McCain despite the fact that the article in the NYT doesn't deal with anything new or maybe even relevant to the campaign. How Bush escaped this treatment I can only guess, but it is mild compared to what candidate Clinton got, so all I can really say to them: is suck on it. By the way, while I am engaging in this kind of surmise, do you think if the campaign let the press at Sare Bare they would have taken this shot at Cindy?
Surprise, shock and some fear in a local neighborhood, after an anti-Obama display is hung from a tree. The display is at a home at Symmes and Hicks Road in Fairfield [Ohio].
And the person who put it there says the message isn't political, it's racist. Shawn Ley spoke with the man who isn't shy about his views.
There it is, right above the "McCain-Palin" sign: a make-shift ghost, hanging from a noose. A Barack Obama sign attached upside down. Obama's middle name: "Hussein" spray painted and misspelled above.
Mike Lunsford hung the ghost in his yard. He spoke to us off-camera, saying his views could hurt his employers business ... but he says make no mistake: He doesn't want an African American running the country.
Lunsford says he believes Barack Obama is not a "full blooded American." And he says the United States is a white, Christian nation - and only with white Christians should be in power. With Lunsford not willing to share his views on-camera:
"It's like whoa. He's definitely anti-black."
His neighbors are. Vickie Crowe lives next door. She's an Obama supporter.
No doubt you've heard that the non-stop Moron-a-thon that is Michele Bachmann (R - Of Course) continued last night on "Hardball" (video below). I know that times are tight, but for those of you who have a few bucks to spare in these last few weeks of the election, please consider sending them to Bachmann's opponent, El Tinklenberg. The DCCC has put the Tinklenberg/Bachmann race in its list of the most competitive races in the country. If you take a look at this Daily Kos Diary you'll see that Tinklenberg is polling well and within reach of beating Bachman. (Tinklenberg thanks the Kossacks here.) A bit more money might help put him over the edge.
You can go directly to his website, or via Act Blue. I just sent him $25. Doesn't matter how you go or how much you give -- even $10 will help. Just go. Michele Bachmann is a (very) poor man's Sarah Palin, a McCarthyite dingbat, and an insult to the House of Representatives, and the slur against the state of Minnesota. At a bare minimum, she deserves censure, but what she really deserves is to be dumped. Now.
P.S. Thanks to Chris Matthews (yes, that's "Thanks") for giving Michele Bachman the rope with which to hang herself.
Scholars and political prognosticators have devised numerous approaches to making election predictions. Add analysis of blinking to the the list.
And on that score, Barack Obama is projected to win in November because John McCain has blinked more than the Democrat during their debates, according to Joseph Tecce, a psychology professor at Boston College who has written a paper about blinking in debates.
Rapid blinking is an indicator of stress, Mr. Tecce said in an interview with Gatehouse News Service. Most people blink 10 to 20 times per minute, a rate that increases to 30 to 50 times per minute if they’re in front of a television camera, he said.
Senator McCain blinked 109 times per minute during the first presidential debate this fall, while Senator Obama blinked 73 times per minute, according to Mr. Tecce, who said that the gap persisted in the following two debates.
The professor said that the candidate who has blinked the most during debates has lost every presidential election since 1976, except for in 2000. George W. Bush blinked more than Al Gore, and lost the popular vote, but captured the White House.
To be fair, Senator Obama displayed some unappealing body language in the debates too, Mr. Tecce told Reuters. The Democrat tended to look at the ground more than his Republican challenger, he said.
But voters seem not to care as much about those visual cues as they do about rapid blinking, he said. When viewers pick up on the blinking, they seem to think, “There’s something about him that’s awfully twitchy and nervous, and I don’t think I want to vote for that guy,” Mr. Tecce said in an interview with Reuters.
I still think the blinking of McCain has to do with reaction to rationalizing lies as he tells them.
Barack Obama and John McCain appeared at the annual Alfred E. Smith Dinner last night, a venerable charity event that George W. Bush always enjoyed "since it helps support Mad Magazine".
Both made mostly light-hearted speeches at the dinner which is actually named for the former New York governor and 1928 Democratic Presidential Nominee. McCain, of course, failed to mention that he was actively campaigning for Hoover that year, where he and his followers accused Smith of "palling around with papists" and being someone who would "allow you to have a beer with him".
But first, McCain appeared on David Letterman, after disastrously (and hilariously) stiffing the last person in America you don't want to piss off and give material. McCain further found out that there is one thing about Letterman for which not enough credit is given, when it comes to politicians, he is a better interviewer than any American news broadcaster. Dave has never suffered fools gladly.
Check out, the exchange in the video above between 1:50 to 3:30 wherein Letterman brings up "associations" the American media is otherwise completely blind toward. Thanks, Dave, you're a national treasure.
I admit I feel kind of bad for this "Joe the Plumber" Guy, I've come to doubt he was a plant (or related to Charles Keating) -- and though in some ways he was reveling in the attention, he probably didn't realize really just what it meant when the McCain campaign decided to exploit him. But nonetheless they did so, and as usual without really looking into the full picture...
John McCain hung his final presidential debate performance on an Ohio plumber who campaign aides never vetted.
A day after making Joseph Wurzelbacher famous, referencing him in the debate almost two dozen times as someone who would pay higher taxes under Barack Obama, McCain learned the fine print Thursday on the plumber’s not-so-tidy personal story: He owes back taxes. He is not a licensed plumber. And it turns out that Wurzelbacher makes less than $250,000 a year, which means he would receive a tax cut if Obama were elected president.
McCain likes to say that he isn’t George W. Bush – and in this case of bungled public relations, it is clear he is not. The famously-disciplined Bush campaign operation would likely have found the perfect anonymous citizen to illustrate a policy proposal, rather than spontaneously wrap itself around an unknown entity with so many asterisks...
A McCain source said Thursday that the campaign read about Wurzelbacher on the Drudge Report, while another campaign aide confirmed that he was not vetted.
Or mourning if you are the McCain campaign...but I guess they'll stay delusional until about 9 p.m. eastern on November 4 when McCain has the irony of using his special cell-phone tower in one of his houses at one of his compounds to call Barack Obama and congratulate the nation's President-Elect.
Meanwhile, three thoughts.
1. McCain started out this campaign with two bases, the enabling media and political independents who thought he wasn't beholden to GOP orthodoxies. The debates have shown that while he has managed to keep a tenuous hold on the punditry, he's lost the political independents. When you keep David Broder at the cost of millions of votes, you're doing it wrong.
2. How do you get an hour and a half of free air time to sell yourself as a great human being with a gracious opponent and manage to walk away even less well liked? You're doing it wrong.
3. Congratulations to Philadelphia, not only are you the Motown of Progressive Blogging, you are the National League Champs. And when you send your unpopular VP choice out in front of Philadelphians at a sporting event, you're doing it wrong.
Bad visuals from McCain, who if this was an election for King of Bad Visuals would win all focus groups. He sort of the John Merrick of Political Visuals:
What a total non-stunner. That makes you, Ron Fournier, and Pat Buchanan. Maybe the three of you can head off to Europe next year and research the tragedy of Germany losing the last world war?
My Review of the final presidential debate between Obama and McCain can be summarized as a series of relentless mean-spirited insipid commentary from McCain. And in case we are unsure of the meaning behind the smirk and jerk:
mean , ignoble , abject , sordid mean being below the normal standards of human decency and dignity. mean suggests having such repellent characteristics as small-mindedness, ill temper, or cupidity <mean and petty satire>. ignoble suggests a loss or lack of some essential high quality of mind or spirit <an ignoble scramble after material possessions>. abject may imply degradation, debasement, or servility. sordid is stronger than all of these in stressing physical or spiritual degradation and abjectness.
What was up with McBlinky tonight? Series of pointless attacks, lies, and weird meandering commentary on Joe T. Plumber as known as Joe the Plumber also called under the alias Joe the small business owner.
Another worthless McCain performance, but expect the Rethuglicans to talk about how tough he was tonight. But yes, the emperor has no clothes. I wonder how many GOPers are going to jump ship after tonight.
Because it's what we left-bloggers have said before -- damn us, right again:
(Reuters) - The Bush administration explicitly endorsed the use of waterboarding and other harsh interrogation methods against al Qaeda suspects in a pair of secret memos to the CIA in 2003 and 2004, The Washington Post reported on Wednesday.
The President of the United States endorsed torture, no ifs ands or buts.