Months of investigation by The New York Times, centered on extensive interviews with Libyans in Benghazi who had direct knowledge of the attack there and its context, turned up no evidence that Al Qaeda or other international terrorist groups had any role in the assault. The attack was led, instead, by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO’s extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam.How dare the original version of events, turn out to be the actual original version of events?
You mean the nutjobs of America actually facilitated the extremists of Libya?
That's "unpossible!"
8 comments:
IIRC, Pam Gellar aka Atlas Juggs was a big supporter of the idiot who made the film...
And Terry Jones.
Darryl Issa: I think that this situation absolutely requires a really futile and stupid gesture be done on somebody's part!
Teabaggers: We're just the guys to do it.
Paul Ryan: [stands up] Yeah, I agree. Let's go get 'em.
It's inconceivable and indisputable!
maybe in 2014, we point out that georgee did more to spread al qaeda than bin laden did..
Pam Gellar aka Atlas Juggs was a big supporter of the idiot who made the film
She inspired the murderer of 77 Norwegians AND the provocation for the killing of 4 American diplomats. She must be so proud.
Ah, Pammy Juggs.
I got nothin'. She's such an easy target for gratuitous insults.
I'll give you a gratuitous insult: The Times story will have absolutely no effect on the right wing's obsession with Benghazi. The nut jobs couldn't find Benghazi on a map, and facts haven't intruded on their nontroversy to this point anyway.
BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI, BENGHAZI. Yippee. Benghazi. OOf. We still doing this?
Post a Comment