Hard to believe I know...

But the Wall Street Journal Editorial Page has managed to draw exactly the most bigoted possible reaction to the whole Mark Foley matter:

But in today's politically correct culture, it's easy to understand how senior Republicans might well have decided they had no grounds to doubt Mr. Foley merely because he was gay and a little too friendly in emails. Some of those liberals now shouting the loudest for Mr. Hastert's head are the same voices who tell us that the larger society must be tolerant of private lifestyle choices, and certainly must never leap to conclusions about gay men and young boys. Are these Democratic critics of Mr. Hastert saying that they now have more sympathy for the Boy Scouts' decision to ban gay scoutmasters? Where's Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on that one?

Jeebus. You know where Nancy Pelosi (or any non-bigoted asshole)is? Against pedophiles -- who are not, by any means, the province of gay men.

Some conservatard fuckwit is a creep and it's naturally the Democrats' (they're all gay you know) fault.

Hey, Log-Cabin Republicans (can it still be pluralized) how is that party loyalty idea coming?