Saturday, June 23, 2007

"Everybody Loves (calling them) Al Qaeda"

I've noticed this sudden change in reporting the last two weeks as our ever-gullible and compliant media (*cough* Michael Gordon *cough*) starts calling everyone killed or acting in some violent fashion against the Americans or Iraqi Government as "Al Qaeda".

It's a lie and a propoganda point, against over-simplifying Iraq for the sole purpose of keeping the disaster in Iraq playing out perpetually until someone not named George W. Bush can be blamed for "losing" what has been lost long-ago.

Glenn Greenwald hits the nail on the head, as usual:

[I]n January of this year, the Cato Institute published a detailed analysis -- entitled "The Myth of an al Qaeda Takeover of Iraq" -- by Ted Galen Carpenter, its vice president for defense and foreign policy studies, documenting that claims of "Al Qaeda in Iraq is "a canard that the perpetrators of the current catastrophe use to frighten people into supporting a fatally flawed, and seemingly endless, nation-building debacle."

What is always most striking about this is how uncritically our press passes on government claims. War reporting in Iraq is obviously extremely difficult and dangerous, and it takes a great deal of courage to be in Iraq in order to file these stories. There is no denying that.

But precisely because of those dangers, these reporters rely almost exclusively on the narratives offered by U.S. military officials selected by the Bush administration to convey events to the press. Almost every one of the articles referenced above is shaped from start to finish by accounts about what happened from American military commanders (with, in isolated instances, accounts from Iraqis in the area). That is inevitable, though such accounts ought to be treated with much greater skepticism.

But what is not inevitable is to adopt the patently misleading nomenclature and political rhetoric of the administration, so plainly designed to generate support for the "surge" (support for which Gordon himself admitted he has embraced) by creating the false appearance that the violence in Iraq is due to attacks by the terrorist group responsible for 9/11.

The press, unbelievably, is lazily allowing itself to be duped again. So that more billions can be spent and more kids killed.

No comments: