With all of this attack the media convention posturing, I still want one very simple question answered: Why is the media so happy and energetic about Palin's mediocre speech when this so-called liberal media said almost nothing about Hillary Clinton's great speech? Or more correctly, this labeled liberal media derided Senator Clinton for not saying "the right thing?" Or "not supportive enough."
I don't know about all of you but Palin's speech was useless... and many of her remarks troubled me and seemed just a series of pasted together one-liners and throw away jingoisms.
Of course, the speech was not written by her or originally even for her. So, why is the media salivating over the fact that Palin can read off the teleprompter when words are broken down for her, words like nuclear.
Can I have an answer?
No comments:
Post a Comment