Who the fuck polls with questions like this?
In a hypothetical match-up for the 2008 Presidential Election, Democrat Hillary Clinton leads Republican Condoleezza Rice by six percentage points--44% to 38%.
Six months ago, Clinton was ahead by seven percentage points--47% to 40%.
The Rasmussen Reports survey also found that the former First Lady leads the current First Lady by ten percentage points, 47% to 37%. Laura Bush has never held public office and never given any indication that she could ever be a candidate.
Nor, for that matter has Rice.
So, naturally if Hillary Clinton is the nominee of the Democratic Party (something I am not particularly enthusiastic about at the moment) she naturally must be matched up against Republican women, including the farcical notion that either of these novices, especially Laura Bush would be candidates?
Nice use of resources there. What kind of a patronizing boob do you have to be to contemplate these as the sort of polls that are needed?