Faux Pas

Have those of us outside of the wing nut special committed an unknown breach of etiquette or is there simply exhaustion setting in or have we over burdened the media overseers with our relentless pursuit of questioning the baselessness of the Bush madness? (simply too many screwups to mention)

Is it possible that events have so exhausted the political and intellectual resources that silence exists in which case some of us have been exploiting laboring colleagues for what may well be thankless work or is there a virtual community to which some of us are not privy?

Concerns such as the Harvard Report on No Child Left Behind, the fate of Professors Churchill and Cole, the topic of pension liability, the higher immorality of Condoleeza Rice, London’s Ricin Ring, the need to urge the psychology brethren to carefully consider what’s going on with psychologists and prisoner interrogation, a context for looking at former Harvard University President Lawrence Summer’s diversity claims, and illustrations of 2005 estimated tax burdens submitted since April have, it seems, ended up in the ether of the Internet, with little commentary and righetous anger!

I am hesitant to post anything that might deal with illustrating and illuminating the contemporary conditions of Bush reality as I gather that too may be quickly becoming passé, something that the Internet postmodernists and online dialecticians have reduced to complaints about historic events rather than as the creeping toward something more sinister which is what is truly happening here.

The Bush regime is deconstructing our democracy, smashing an entire generation with heavy tax burdens, it is not just the too easy punching bag of Bush himself that must be opposed. We must stop the Republican party. The wing nuts and religious wackos must be fought.

Or it may be there’s a secret code that has some how been violated leaving some of us like the character in Kafka’s, The Trial.