Tuesday, December 19, 2006

"Ah'll listen to the Generals"

Except he won't:

The Bush administration is split over the idea of a surge in troops to Iraq, with White House officials aggressively promoting the concept over the unanimous disagreement of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to U.S. officials familiar with the intense debate.

Sending 15,000 to 30,000 more troops for a mission of possibly six to eight months is one of the central proposals on the table of the White House policy review to reverse the steady deterioration in Iraq. The option is being discussed as an element in a range of bigger packages, the officials said.

But the Joint Chiefs think the White House, after a month of talks, still does not have a defined mission and is latching on to the surge idea in part because of limited alternatives, despite warnings about the potential disadvantages for the military, said the officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the White House review is not public.

The chiefs have taken a firm stand, the sources say, because they believe the strategy review will be the most important decision on Iraq to be made since the March 2003 invasion.

So, they'll be ignored, or cajoled. This is just like the Winter & Spring of 2003 when the disaster was shoved down our throats ... and while virtually everyone is against escalation (and now the war) the brave, brave McCain/Lieberman coalition is determined to kill even more people for their twisted version of honor.

No comments: