Bulge or electronic cueing device?

Well, what do you know?! He wasn't glad to meet me.

In the weeks leading up to the November 2 election, the New York Times was abuzz with excitement. Besides the election itself, the paper’s reporters were hard at work on two hot investigative projects, each of which could have a major impact on the outcome of the tight presidential race.

One week before Election Day, the Times (10/25/04) ran a hard-hitting and controversial exposé of the Al-Qaqaa ammunition dump—identified by U.N. inspectors before the war as containing 400 tons of special high-density explosives useful for aircraft bombings and as triggers for nuclear devices, but left unguarded and available to insurgents by U.S. forces after the invasion.

On Thursday, just three days after that first exposé, the paper was set to run a second, perhaps more explosive piece, exposing how George W. Bush had worn an electronic cueing device in his ear and probably cheated during the presidential debates.



Ok, is anyone surprised that this guy may have cheated during the debates? And if he did, shouldn't he have performed just a little bit better? Man, Bush can't deliver even when he gets the lines given to him. Not that it mattered, millions who voted for Bush could not look past all of the "gay marriage" screams of the religious right.

Or maybe its just a stigmata on his back?