Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Republicans deciding against the Decider

Bruce Bartlett, former Reagan and Poppy Bush insider, has been critical of the Chimperor Disgustus on many matters, usually in a reserved Jerry Ford way (except he didn't wait until he was dead). In the New York Times he says it's time to start withdrawing in phases -- endorsing the plan that Democrats have (you know the plan that the Bush Administration says they don't have):

This still leaves the question of what to do now that we are in Iraq. Just because the war was wrong in the first place doesn’t necessarily justify an immediate pullout. There is danger this could make a bad situation worse, might embolden our enemies and invite new attacks. That is why I have hesitated calling for disengagement.

But I have come to the conclusion that the situation could not be any worse and that the American presence in Iraq is causing as much conflict as it is preventing. Therefore, I think we should disengage as rapidly as possible. Adding additional troops, as Bush plans to do, simply means throwing good money after bad.

Perhaps if Bush still had any credibility, I would be willing to give him the benefit of a doubt, as I did four years ago. But since then, we have learned how incredibly poor the prewar intelligence was, how Bush essentially bullied intelligence analysts into giving him the reports he wanted, and how he undertook the war with insufficient forces and without giving any thought to postwar planning or an exit strategy.

At this point, it is obvious even to Bush that the status quo is untenable, and he has put the last of his chips on the table to try to salvage something he can call a victory. But there still is no realistic plan for achieving it — or even a definition of victory in the context of Iraq. Consequently, I don’t see how this troop surge can possibly succeed. All it will do is put off the inevitable pullout by another year or more, which means that hundreds more of our fighting men and women will die in vain.


The only difference right now between many Republicans and virtually all Democrats at the moment is that the former will not explicitly call Bush a "dumbfuck".

No comments: