Who can be surprised that FoxNews would respond to a University study finding its viewers were by far the most misinformed consumers of news with an ad hominem attack that turned out to be...very inaccurate?
6 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Ignoring Faux is about the best I can do. Blowing it up would be a worthwhile mission. It may explode from its own gases is a fond Christmas wish. vox
What StonyPillow said. I would urge everyone to attach the adjective "anti-American" to FOX NEWS, and Republican every time the despicable words are used.
Rising Hegemon
6 comments:
Ignoring Faux is about the best I can do. Blowing it up would be a worthwhile mission. It may explode from its own gases is a fond Christmas wish.
vox
Murdoch's strategy: Deflect, deflect, deflect.
"Anything that keeps people stupid is a felony." -- Harlan Ellison
Anti-American reactionary Australian propaganda.
I was wondering if we could do a class-action suit for False Advertising, or even Product Liability since they call themselves "News"?
Section 2 of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability distinguishes between three major types of product liability claims:
* manufacturing defect,
* design defect,
* a failure to warn (also known as marketing defects).
FOX clearly suffers from all three.
fux viewers don't care. it's cozy there.
What StonyPillow said. I would urge everyone to attach the adjective "anti-American" to FOX NEWS, and Republican every time the despicable words are used.
Fred Flintstone
Post a Comment