Olbermann gave money to Democrats? I know, shocking.
I can only think Brad Childress was somehow involved in this decision -- other than the fact it will probably end up boosting Olbermann's ratings.
4 comments:
StonyPillow
said...
Olbermann and Maddow are fig leaves. The country would be better off without them, because the networks couldn't use them to hide their raging right wing hard-ons and pretend they're not the corporate whores they are.
And the sad fact is, there's nothing on Olbermann you didn't already know.
Turn off the friggin' boob tube, folks -- ain't nothin' there for us.
i, for one, need to be spoon feed at times, stony. he raises lots of things i didn't already know. beside, i think people tune in not so much for the news, but for keith's ridicule of the right. something they clearly cannot stand, seeing how badly they want to oust him.
how can you just shrug off blatant corporate censorship?
Rising Hegemon
4 comments:
Olbermann and Maddow are fig leaves. The country would be better off without them, because the networks couldn't use them to hide their raging right wing hard-ons and pretend they're not the corporate whores they are.
And the sad fact is, there's nothing on Olbermann you didn't already know.
Turn off the friggin' boob tube, folks -- ain't nothin' there for us.
Torches and pitchforks, to the streets, cafes, people. Liberty and equality brothers and sisters
vox
i, for one, need to be spoon feed at times, stony. he raises lots of things i didn't already know. beside, i think people tune in not so much for the news, but for keith's ridicule of the right. something they clearly cannot stand, seeing how badly they want to oust him.
how can you just shrug off blatant corporate censorship?
gee. what vast rite wing conspiracy.
Post a Comment