What it really all means

That despite what you read from many bloggers -- the Democrats have two good candidates that most of those participating in the voting LIKE and will vote for in November. That the GOP had a bunch of candidates they didn't like all that much, and they settled on "the past" by committing themselves to the same colossal errors in the future.

That the most underreported story is how the Democrats are happy with their field and the GOP isn't and that the Democrats continue to get a much, much, much bigger turn out at the polls than the GOP.

It also means the public will be hearing about Obama and Clinton for a few months -- and not about the GOP much longer. See ya' in August McCain, enjoy the "Larry Craig Memorial Men's Room"!

In general, Obama won far more States than most predicted (including Idaho, Utah, Kansas, Alaska and North Dakota -- all known for their huge African-American voting blocks) but Clinton won the big states she was supposed to including California, the biggest. If Obama had won there, it would have been a mortal blow, but he didn't really come close.

So it's kind of a draw.