What Mistermix says...
IOKIYAR:There are 17 paragraphs in the New York Times front page story about the START treaty. Fifteen of them are devoted to the giant risk that President Obama is taking in pushing our most vestigial legislative body to hold a fucking vote on a treaty that’s critical for our national security...
...if the tables were turned, and Democrats were opposing START over the wishes of a Republican President, that they’d be mau-maued into next week by the press and Republicans, because our vital and sacred national security is at stake.
Rising Hegemon
7 comments:
Let's all do the bipartizan twist. Together?
Nevah.
GOP is part of the AXIS against USA Paul Krugman said this morning.
vox
We used to be a republic. Now we're just a Teapublican insane asylum.
Thank you false-equivalency media for drowning out the sane.
....17 paragraphs in the New York Times front page story about the START treaty. Fifteen of them are devoted to the giant risk that President Obama is taking.....
...if the tables were turned, and Democrats were opposing START over the wishes of a Republican President, that they’d be mau-maued into next week by the press and Republicans, because our vital and sacred national security is at stake.
Seriously. Atta?
Are you seriously expecting your readers to swallow the canard that the New York Times would in any way, shape or form support the Republicans?
You must think your supportive readers are even less intelligent than I think they are.......
our statesmen at werk.
It rears it's ugly, mis-informed head once again. I guess there is no stopping stupid.
Refusing to believe the evidence he can view with his own eyes, he instead attacks his perceptions of New York Times. Bravo, OnA, bravo. I'm sure Judy Miller feels the same way.
besides the usual reflex of republican obstructionism, isn't this also the MIC's effort to keep the ever profitable (and yet ineffective) star wars missile defense project alive?
~
google the nyt's board members. bunch of nonprofit hippies, they are not.
for people still on the short bus: above all else and at the end of the day, corporate media serves to defend corporate interests.
Ideological nonsense?
What ideological nonsense?
Post a Comment