One of his ideological fellow travelers agrees with his definition!
Thank goodness Republicans are bringing back hate and ignorance to debates again. I can hardly wait for that Glenn Beck rally on the anniversary of the "I have a Dream Speech"
Republicans are bringing back hate and ignorance to debates again.
Attaturk is definitely an ideologue. Here Atta shows his ignorance and partisanship towards the debate by ignoring that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also full square opposed to gay marriage.
They have been stoking those fires since Nixon's Southern Strategy (and Oily Ass once again reveals his ideological blinders and ignorance of history).
There have been 3 comments since I pointed out that the Democratic Party and Obama also strongly oppose gay marriage and yet the regulars continue to ignore this fact in their usual childish fashion, fingers in the ears and chanting la-la-la-la.
Actually, this particular issue of gay marriage is one where myself and many posting here are probably in basic agreement. I support changing laws in favor of same sex marriage, not at all surprising since I'm a classical liberal.
After all, O&A is standard-issue conservative. No originality, and a very good follower.
Wrong, again. I'm not a conservative, nor a 'follower', I'm a classical liberal as evidenced by my stance in favor of same sex marriage, as well as my support of many other issues typically characterized as 'liberal'.
"I'm not a conservative, nor a 'follower', I'm a classical liberal as evidenced by my stance in favor of same sex marriage, as well as my support of many other issues typically characterized as 'liberal'."
"I voted for the following:
Reagan both times, '80 and '84 Bush senior the first time in '88 Clinton both times, '92 and '96 Bush junior both times 2000 and '04 McCain."
Attaturk is definitely an ideologue. Here Atta shows his ignorance and partisanship towards the debate by ignoring that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also full square opposed to gay marriage.
Bzzt ... A Feb. 2010 ABC News/WaPo poll should that 60% of Democrats support gay marriage, 39% against. This finding backs up earlier polls done by Gallup. That's not "most".
Even on issues we agree with, OnA finds a way to be classically wrong.
....that 60% of Democrats support gay marriage, 39% against. This finding backs up earlier polls done by Gallup. That's not "most"....Even on issues we agree with, OnA finds a way to be classically wrong.
Dan, Bzzzt.
I guess you didn't take that reading comprehension course I suggested for you?
I said that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also opposed to gay marriage.
The poll results you cite are Democrat supporters, not Obama or the Party, not those that we elected. The poll you cited is "a random national sample of 1,004 adults including users of both conventional and cellular phones."
o&A: the thing you're missing, on purpose, I would hazard, is that attaturk's post is about the virulent bigotry among and calls for violence from the folks supporting NOM and other hate groups.
I said that Obama and most of the Democratic Party
Ah crap ... If you mean Democratic Party Officials, then say Democratic Party Officials. No one here can divine how your weaselly mind works, and your pathetic semantic games get pretty god damn tiring.
Since same-sex marriage is not a party plank (yet), I can only assume that this is true from a defacto POV. Since there is no readily available polling on Democratic Party Officials on this issue, you're still just making shit up and you know it.
Dan. There's that rather bothersome reading comprehension problems of yours rearing its head again.
It should have been quite obvious for you. Obama is clearly a Party official (as you call). Why would I include Obama (in my statement) if I was actually referring to the people that usually answer telephone polling studies?
Or I suppose next you're gonna tell me that Gallup and the others regularly call Barack Obama on his blackberry?
...Dan, did you seriously think I was setting some kind of semantic trap for you to fall into ??
You should seriously consider taking a reading comprehension course, as I have already suggested to you.
Rising Hegemon
19 comments:
The intolerance? The bigotry? The hatred? It's in there.
Republicans are bringing back hate and ignorance to debates again.
Attaturk is definitely an ideologue.
Here Atta shows his ignorance and partisanship towards the debate by ignoring that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also full square opposed to gay marriage.
I call fake Olives and Arrows. Whooo are yooooou, troll?
Oh, no, SP, that's a standard O&A Repug tactic--turn the issue back on the ones noting the conservatives' wretched excesses and blame them.
As if there's no qualitative difference between disagreeing with a proposed policy and hanging the people proposing the policy.
It's a standard Rove technique, and O&A imitates well. After all, O&A is standard-issue conservative. No originality, and a very good follower.
They have been stoking those fires since Nixon's Southern Strategy (and Oily Ass once again reveals his ideological blinders and ignorance of history).
...that's very odd.
There have been 3 comments since I pointed out that the Democratic Party and Obama also strongly oppose gay marriage and yet the regulars continue to ignore this fact in their usual childish fashion, fingers in the ears and chanting la-la-la-la.
Actually, this particular issue of gay marriage is one where myself and many posting here are probably in basic agreement. I support changing laws in favor of same sex marriage, not at all surprising since I'm a classical liberal.
After all, O&A is standard-issue conservative. No originality, and a very good follower.
Wrong, again. I'm not a conservative, nor a 'follower', I'm a classical liberal as evidenced by my stance in favor of same sex marriage, as well as my support of many other issues typically characterized as 'liberal'.
Good to see the NAAWP out in force again, down memory lane. Ahhhhhh.
"I'm not a conservative, nor a 'follower', I'm a classical liberal as evidenced by my stance in favor of same sex marriage, as well as my support of many other issues typically characterized as 'liberal'."
"I voted for the following:
Reagan both times, '80 and '84
Bush senior the first time in '88
Clinton both times, '92 and '96
Bush junior both times 2000 and '04
McCain."
are you 'bragging'?
republikkklans can only win by dividing.
Attaturk is definitely an ideologue.
Here Atta shows his ignorance and partisanship towards the debate by ignoring that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also full square opposed to gay marriage.
Bzzt ... A Feb. 2010 ABC News/WaPo poll should that 60% of Democrats support gay marriage, 39% against. This finding backs up earlier polls done by Gallup. That's not "most".
Even on issues we agree with, OnA finds a way to be classically wrong.
Pansy,
Probably not true that the Republicans can only win through dividing, especially when considering that they win almost two thirds of the time.
btw,
....you could also consider dumping the childish use of your 3 Ks. Your game is already weak enough without adding such infantile silliness.
....that 60% of Democrats support gay marriage, 39% against. This finding backs up earlier polls done by Gallup. That's not "most"....Even on issues we agree with, OnA finds a way to be classically wrong.
Dan,
Bzzzt.
I guess you didn't take that reading comprehension course I suggested for you?
I said that Obama and most of the Democratic Party are also opposed to gay marriage.
The poll results you cite are Democrat supporters, not Obama or the Party, not those that we elected. The poll you cited is "a random national sample of 1,004 adults including users of both conventional and cellular phones."
"...you could also consider dumping the childish use of your 3 Ks."
I remember OnAn's ceaseless maladroit use of "bliekkker" Wish he were still around to rip this mad idiot a new asshole.
OnA, you're a fraud. Go somewhere else.
o&A: the thing you're missing, on purpose, I would hazard, is that attaturk's post is about the virulent bigotry among and calls for violence from the folks supporting NOM and other hate groups.
life is so much better if you just ignore the isiot.
wolftone,
There are hate groups on all sides of the political spectrum, supporters of neither the Democratic Party nor the Republicans have a monopoly on that.
I said that Obama and most of the Democratic Party
Ah crap ... If you mean Democratic Party Officials, then say Democratic Party Officials. No one here can divine how your weaselly mind works, and your pathetic semantic games get pretty god damn tiring.
Since same-sex marriage is not a party plank (yet), I can only assume that this is true from a defacto POV. Since there is no readily available polling on Democratic Party Officials on this issue, you're still just making shit up and you know it.
Dan.
There's that rather bothersome reading comprehension problems of yours rearing its head again.
It should have been quite obvious for you. Obama is clearly a Party official (as you call). Why would I include Obama (in my statement) if I was actually referring to the people that usually answer telephone polling studies?
Or I suppose next you're gonna tell me that Gallup and the others regularly call Barack Obama on his blackberry?
...Dan, did you seriously think I was setting some kind of semantic trap for you to fall into ??
You should seriously consider taking a reading comprehension course, as I have already suggested to you.
Post a Comment