He did complain about Reagan's deficits, although he didn't point out that Reagan's deficits were almost an order of magnitude higher than Carter's. He also thought that the deficits were impossible to fix, so he never mentioned the surpluses created by Clinton's relatively minor tax increases -- maybe because Broder was too busy watching Matlock!
Rising Hegemon
5 comments:
By now, I doubt that Broder even remembers who Ronald Reagan was, let alone what he did.
But, he still gets a thrill up his leg, a sort of reaction of the autonomic nervous system, when he hears the name.
Has the paper no shame to keep using Broder's name to continue to claim fair and balanced acclaim for all those discredited lower bowel pains?
vox
since raygun and georgee are now mythic in the republikkkklan mind, reality does not apply.
pansypoo
Deficits don't splatter...er, matter.
He did complain about Reagan's deficits, although he didn't point out that Reagan's deficits were almost an order of magnitude higher than Carter's. He also thought that the deficits were impossible to fix, so he never mentioned the surpluses created by Clinton's relatively minor tax increases -- maybe because Broder was too busy watching Matlock!
Post a Comment