A huge cache of secret US military files today provides a devastating portrait of the failing war in Afghanistan, revealing how coalition forces have killed hundreds of civilians in unreported incidents, Taliban attacks have soared and Nato commanders fear neighbouring Pakistan and Iran are fuelling the insurgency.
And on that score, see the next round pushed by the Right, after they get done calling Obama Hitler and an appeaser simultaneously:
A former CIA director says military action against Iran now seems more likely because no matter what the U.S. does diplomatically, Tehran keeps pushing ahead with its suspected nuclear program.
Michael Hayden, a CIA chief under President George W. Bush, says that during his tenure a strike was "way down the list" of options. But he tells CNN's "State of the Union" that such action now "seems inexorable."
Tune seems familiar.
5 comments:
Summer's no time to roll out a new product.
Hayden should be hung for treason
vox
Attack Iran, and if you think we have economic misery now, think stock market crash and oil at $200 a barrel.
Hayden would love to have that happen on Obama's watch.
I know this may seem stupid, but maybe if we didn't have half our military in the country to the east of Iran and half in the country to the west of them, and we didn't continually make noises about invading them, maybe they'd be more amenable to forgoing their nuclear research? But I'm just an idealistic hippie pacifist, so what do I know.
bush spent how many years 'making progress'? and the gnews believed them.
pansypoo
Post a Comment