Tuesday, August 24, 2010

Which is Worse?

Re-electing Charlie Rangel -- or not re-electing Charlie Rangel? If I knew the latter option would result in a Congressman Tasini, I'd be pleased. But I think the actual result would be Congressman Powell, as in Adam Clayton IV, and political pedigree notwithstanding, I doubt that would prove much in the way of progress.

So I ask you again, which is worse: Rangel or not-Rangel?

3 comments:

JDM said...

Bloomberg. The answer to "worse" in New York City is always The Walnut Head Homunculus.

wolfetone75 said...

Well, for the longterm health our national politics Rangel has to go.

pansypoo said...

he needs to go out in a blze of good now.